Saturday, June 14, 2008

The Siphon Bar Pours a $20,000 Cup of Coffee

No, it’s not a steampunk chemistry set. That picture is of the United States’ only halogen-powered siphon bar. Imported from Japan after years of negotiations, the $20,000+ machine is housed at San Francisco’s Blue Bottle Café. Each “pot” consists of two globes. Water vapor evaporates from the bottom globe into the higher globe to meet the grounds. The coffee is then stirred with a bamboo paddle, removed from the heat and siphoned back to the lower globe (minus grounds). It sounds delicious…and totally worth whatever it costs per cup. Hit the NYT for the full mad scientist process in photos.

Source:
http://gizmodo.com/347967/the-siphon-bar-pours-a-20000-cup-of-coffee

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 03:15:37 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Kahva Coffee Maker Design Is Classy, Glassy

Lina Fischer’s coffee maker design is scrumptious and works rather like an espresso maker would, but is better looking (although less iconic than those little moka pots caffeine heads go bubbly over). It comes with its own induction-powered table station, but what really sets the Kahva apart from other coffee makers is what happens to the Joe when it’s brewed.

As the water heats, the rising air pressure makes it flow upwards from the glass water chamber into the metal brewing unit. Once the coffee is ready, take it off the heat and the coffee will return through a filter into the Kahva’s glass bottom via a vacuum that has been created by the cooling of the coffee maker. To pour, simply turn the grip and let the coffee flow.

Source:
http://gizmodo.com/371768/kahva-coffee-maker-design-is-classy-glassy

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 03:14:39 | Permalink | Comments (2)

HeartBeans Grinds Coffee In Rhythm to Your Caffeine-Powered Heartbeat

I understand that there are many people out there who can’t face the day without a cup of coffee. Hell, I’m guzzling a black coffee down as I write this. However, I draw the line at having an emotional, “intimate” experience with my delicious bean-based beverage—the kind of experience that the HeartBeans grinder promises to deliver. According to the project page, HeartBeans utilizes a motor inside a mahogany shell that measures the pace of the user’s beating heart. By operating in sync with the heartbeat, it is intended to “induce an experience of intimacy with the process of making coffee” while producing a different flavor with each use.

If that wasn’t hilarious and/or frightening enough, the designers compare holding the device to holding a baby or a musical instrument, i.e. “very affectionately.” In doing so we bring about the same closeness for the grinder as we do for the other things we care about. Hmm…baby or grinder…baby or grinder? I mean, I love my kid but this is coffee we are talking about here! All joking aside, this crazy-ass piece of equipment is only a concept, so don’t expect to see it advertised at your local Starbucks anytime soon.

Videos of the grinder in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mnNAB0lPsg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktIlZalY96o

Source:
http://gizmodo.com/387242/heartbeans-grinds-coffee-in-rhythm-to-your-caffeine+powered-heartbeat

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 03:12:42 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Researchers devise coffee machine that can tell good coffee from bad

It looks like coffee technology could be about to take another leap forward, with Nestle researchers now touting that they’ve devised a machine that can tell the difference between good coffee and bad coffee — espresso, in particular. Apparently, the machine has “nearly” the taste accuracy of a panel of trained espresso tasters, who, if this machine is any indication, may soon have to kiss their envious job goodbye (like so many others that have been forced to confront the cold hard reality of the machines taking over). While there’s apparently still quite a bit of work to be done on the coffee tasting machine, Nestle eventually sees it being used as a quality control device for the entire coffee industry.

Source:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/13/researchers-devise-coffee-machine-that-can-tell-good-coffee-from/

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 03:09:14 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Friday, June 13, 2008

Drinking coffee in Cuba

Here are some of my photos of Cuba. It’s a facinating island, stuck in a time warp but rich with flavor and history. You can taste the island in every cup of coffee, every cigar, every sip of rum… all these things and more taste distinctly Cuban. And so how does the coffee taste? It is full bodied like a good Nicaraguan or Sumatran coffee but with a bit more acidity, smooth to the palet and without a bitter finish it radiates it’s aroma like an espresso’s crema. The aroma surrounds your senses in a cigar like cloud introducing you to the sweet Cuban sugarcane flavor of all things on this magnificent island.
 













Posted by Fresh Roaster in 15:59:27 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Cuba: A Once-Proud Coffee Industry Falls On Hard Times

  When José Gaviña was a little boy, his family owned a farm at a place called Hacienda Buenos Aires, just south of Tope de Collantes in the central Cuban province of Las Villas.

About a third of the Gaviñas’ 390 acres was planted with coffee, and the operation included both a dry and wet mill. Since Cuban coffee was highly sought after, the family business to flourished.

“Whatever we exported would get a premium over the world market, and most of our coffee went to Holland and Germany,” recalled Gaviña. “We didn’t sell to the U.S., because the Americans wouldn’t pay the price at the time. It was much better to sell the coffee domestically.”

Then economic disaster struck. In 1959, Fidel Castro and his band of guerrillas overthrew the Batista dictatorship and promptly began nationalizing all Cuban industries. The Gaviña family farm was confiscated in 1960 and then 14-year-old José Gaviña and his parents - as well as hundreds of thousands of other middle-class and wealthy Cubans - fled the island, eventually ending up in the United States.

Since the Revolution, the Cuban coffee industry has never been the same. Observations made during a recent four-day trip to the island and interviews with officials - government bureaucrats, foreign diplomats and industry sources - all lead to the conclusion that when it comes to putting Cuba on the world coffee map, the Marxists have really blown it.

“The industry is completely destroyed,” says Gaviña, now based in Los Angeles. “The only good coffee that’s coming out of Cuba these days is being exported to Europe. Before the revolution, most of the good-quality coffee stayed in Cuba. We had a very high per-capita consumption, and today there isn’t even enough to go around.”

According to historians, coffee was introduced into Cuba in the mid-18th century. At that time, forests still covered most of the island, creating the necessary environment of high humidity, undisturbed soils and fresh climate. These early coffee farms, supplanted by African slave labor, gradually spread over the western plains and smooth hills around Havana, the capital. By 1790, Cuba was already exporting 185,000 quintales a year to Spain. Later on, carried by French farmers fleeing the revolution in nearby Haiti, coffee farms expanded to cover the nearby mountain ranges.

By the 1820s, coffee production was an integral part of the Cuban economy, certainly more important than sugar. Between 1831 to 1835, Cuba’s average coffee output was equivalent to 56% of the output of the best years of the 20th century (1956 to 1960), whereas sugar production in the early 1800s barely reached 1% of the level it achieved 150 years later.

Yet throughout the latter half of the 19th century, the Cuban coffee sector went through some dramatic ups and downs, and by 1877, only 192 coffee plantations were in production, down from 2,067 only 50 years earlier. This was partly due to disruptions caused by Cuba’s battle for independence against the Spanish colonizers. Yet by 1895, production was once again up, and in that year, 153,800 quintales were exported.

In 1902, the year Cuban patriot José Martí declared independence from Spain, coffee production was once again undergoing a drastic reduction in favor of sugar cane and tobacco, though the imposition of tariffs in 1927 - mainly against Puerto Rico - sparked a rebirth. From 1900 to 1925, imports averaged 12,000 tons annually, though in the 1930s imports virtually disappeared and Cuba gradually began to export coffee. By 1956, the country was exporting over 20,000 metric tons of coffee beans valued at $21.5 million. In 1962, thanks to agricultural and industrial improvements, Cuba’s coffee industry achieved a yield of 316.6 pounds per acre, its highest ever. Unfortunately for Cuba, the Marxist revolution that swept Castro into power occurred at a time when coffee production was at its peak. During the 1950s, the industry’s average rate of growth was 1.7% a year, in spite of a poor harvest in 1958 that was most likely related to the escalation of guerrilla activity by Castro’s band of revolutionaries in the Sierra Maestra, Cuba’s principal coffee-growing area.

Following Castro’s nationalization of the country’s coffee farms and everything else that had been in private hands, the Cuban coffee industry entered into a long and severe period of decline. The Communist government imposed new rules, and by the end of the 1960s, coffee output had fallen to levels comparable to the 1930s; by the mid-70s, the results were at levels similar to the dismal 1920s.

Finally, in the late 70s, a slight recovery began, and about 45,000 hectares were planted with coffee between 1979 and 1982. The effort was aimed at reducing imports - which by then had surpassed 30,000 tons annually - and to increase exports, which accounted for nearly half of the total harvest in those years.

The 1990 collapse of the Soviet Union, Cuba’s main benefactor, devastated the Cuban economy and encouraged massive emigration to the cities, which only hastened the coffee sector’s further decline. Average coffee yield had fallen to 135.7 pounds per acre by the early 90s, and mountain dwellers were fleeing to Havana, Santiago de Cuba, Holguín and other cities at a rate of more than 4% annually. In spite of the building of hundreds of kilometers of new roads and the introduction of electricity, good schools and modern medical care to even the most remote areas, coffee areas rapidly became depopulated and plantations were abandoned. But experts say the Soviet collapse wasn’t the only factor. A misguided campaign in the early 1960s had tried to create a coffee belt around Havana’s barren plains, using volunteer labor exclusively.

“Despite the advice of specialists - and common sense - the project consumed millions of dollars before it was abandoned. Meanwhile, traditional farms in the mountains received less attention,” reported the newsletter CubaNews in January 1996. “In an effort to stimulate production, the government unveiled the so-called Turquino Plan under the direct supervision of Raúl Castro in 1989. Again, the agricultural infrastructure was improved, but even after building new homes for agricultural workers, the project attracted little response.”

From 1986 to 1996, coffee exports averaged 12,600 tons a year, compared to only 11,200 tons exported in 1957 when the output totaled 43,600 tons. However, poor harvests in the late 1990s have taken their toll on exports, falling from 24,120 tons in 1994 to 6,400 tons in 1997 and recovering slightly to 8,400 tons in 1998. Today, export revenue from coffee comes to just 1% of the total value of Cuban exports, down from 3.9% in 1956.

“The loss of experienced workers has forced the government to rely on unpaid middle- and high-school students to harvest the coffee crop,” reports CubaNews. “During the harvest, tens of thousands of students go into the mountains for several weeks to pick coffee. While they are reportedly earnest in their efforts, their lack of experience and stamina is one reason the sector continues to languish.”

The difficulty in increasing coffee production has been the main reason the Castro regime cannot seem to boost exports significantly, though it manages to maintain exports partly by limiting coffee consumption among Cubans through rationing. And while Cubita-brand coffee sells for $6.10 a kilo in the dollar markets, the majority of Cubans don’t have access to dollars and are therefore forced to make do with their ration of two ounces of coffee every two weeks per adult.

“While exporting its highest-quality coffee to Europe and Japan, the government reportedly imports cheaper coffee and mixes it with lower-quality domestic grades and some roasted wheat to supply local demand,” says CubaNews. “Rationing and low availability of coffee reportedly have driven annual per-capita domestic consumption down from 12 pounds in the late 1950s to just three pounds now.”

Today, Cuba’s coffee plantations are located mainly in three regions. The most important are on the slopes and valleys between 1,000 and 2,000 ft, located in the Nipe-Baracoa and Sierra Maestra mountains of eastern Cuba (in the provinces of Santiago de Cuba and Granma); the Escambray mountains near the center of the island (in the provinces of villa Clara, Cienfuegos and Sancti Spíritus); and, to a lesser extent, the Sierra del Rosario, close to the western tip of Cuba in the province of Pinar del Rio.

These locations provide a comfort zone for the coffee bean, with 55 to 70 inches of rain and moisture evenly distributed during the year, deep and rich soils, and temperatures ranging from 21 degrees Celsius in the winter up to 25 degrees Celsius in the summer.

Cuban coffees are classified as Crystal Mountain, Extraturquino, Turquino, Altura, Montana, Cumbre, Serrano superior, Serrano corriente and Caracolillo (oval-shaped). The finest of these is Crystal Mountain, which is now being sold on the Japanese market.

As if government mismanagement and low commodity prices weren’t bad enough, in 1997 and 1998 the island suffered from an unusually severe drought. Then, in September 1998, the industry took a further beating from Hurricane George, which devastated eastern Cuba, where 80% of the coffee crop grows.

Cuban sources say the coffee harvest ending in March 2000 came in at 18,000 tons, well above the 11,000 tons produced in the harvest that ended in March 1999. Of the 18,000 tons, about 16,000 tons came from eastern Cuba, where the vast majority of the coffee crop is grown. The central provinces produced around 1,500 tons, while Pinar del Rio province in the extreme west accounted for the remaining 500 tons. Coffee no longer grows in the deforested and exhausted soils in the plains and hills around Havana.

Cuba normally exports 60% to 70% of its coffee crop and imports cheaper, lower-quality beans for domestic consumption. However, in 1999 total exports came to 3,079 tons - down dramatically from the 8,080 tons exported in 1998. Recently, complaints have surfaced over the fact that the amount of chicory added to coffee sold within Cuba has risen from 40% to 60%, while the quality of imported beans has fallen.

The government owns most of the coffee plantations in Cuba, though in the 1990s it began to reverse earlier policies and allowed farmers to lease land for the first time since the revolution. This policy, as well as new efforts to improve medical services and housing for agricultural workers, has convinced some of the 80,000 farmers who abandoned the coffee-growing zones in the 1970s and 1980s to return.

However, the government has not been able to reverse the decline in the total number of coffee workers, partly because growers with leased land are still obliged to sell their production to the government at fixed prices in relatively worthless Cuban pesos. Even swap deals are forbidden, according to sources. So far, only about 3,000 families are reported to have returned to the growing zones.

Since 1996, the Castro regime has been allocating to the coffee sector a percentage of the hard-currency income generated by coffee exports to buy fertilizer and equipment.

At present, Japan and France are the top importers of Cuban coffee, accounting for roughly 5,000 and 2,500 tons respectively. Japan’s Meiwa Corp. and France’s Cafe Legal are the chief importers in those countries, buying 75-80% of Cuba’s total coffee exports. The U.S., of course, imports not a single coffee bean from Cuba and hasn’t since 1962, when the Kennedy administration imposed an economic blockade against the island. Unfortunately, Cuban Agriculture Ministry officials declined to be interviewed for this article, and neither director Wilfredo Díaz Hernández nor executive secretary Carlos Bustamante González of the Estaci imposed an economic blockade against the island. Unfortunately, Cuban Agriculture Ministry officials declined to be interviewed for this article, and neither director Wilfredo Díaz Hernández nor executive secretary Carlos Bustamente González of the Estación Central de Investigaciones de Café y Cacao in Santagio de Cuba could be reached for comment.

Gaviña doesn’t mind commenting, however. Today, the 55-year-old is chief financial officer at F. Gaviña & Sons Inc., which was founded by Gaviña’s parents, sister and three brothers. “When we had our plantation, if we had a breakdown in one of the machines, we’d get that part, whatever and wherever it was,” he said. “Now, that everything belongs to the government, people don’t care that much. The only time you pay attention is when your pocket is being hurt. When you’re picking coffee, you have to do it now. You cannot wait.”

In February 1999, a group of coffee producers and importers from 15 countries met in Havana to evaluate the Cuban coffee industry and discuss ways to boost production. At that time, the Castro government vowed to boost production to 45,360 tons per year, though it’s still unclear over what time period this is supposed to happen. Observers say the goal seems highly unlikely, considering the disastrous prices on the world coffee market this year, not to mention the enormous investments Cuba would need to achieve such an increase - and the fact that the U.S. market, the world’s largest, remains closed to Cuba.

“When we left the country in 1960, we thought we were going to go back right away because we thought the U.S. government wouldn’t allow a Communist country ninety miles from its shores,” said Gaviña. “And here we still are, forty-one years later.”

During that time, the Gaviña family has built its business into a $60 million-a-year empire, selling 22 million pounds of coffee a year to McDonald’s, Costco (formerly Price Club) and private labels. And even though he has permission to visit his homeland, Gaviña - like many Cuban exiles living in the United States - refuses to do so out of principle.

“I will never go to Cuba as long as Castro is there. We are in the U.S. because of him,” he says. “Why would I give any money to a guy who destroyed my country? We really hate his guts.”

Yet Gaviña - unlike the vast majority of his compatriots in Miami and elsewhere - concedes that Washington’s anti-Cuba policies have been utterly counterproductive.

“If it weren’t for the embargo, Castro would have been gone a long time ago,” he said. “Throughout the years, he has used his conflicts with the United States to get rid of people who might have been against him.”

That’s an argument raised frequently by opponents of current U.S. policy on Cuba, a group that has traditionally been led by liberal Democrats but which in more recent years has included Republicans from farm states in the Midwest who are eager to promote grain sales to the Cuban government. If the embargo is lifted, Cuba - which for years has built its economy around sugar, nickel and citrus exports - could one day supply Maxwell House, Folger’s and Nestle with coffee.

Even so, given the Bush administration’s recent pronouncements on the issue (and the powerful Cuban exile lobby in South Florida that helped elect him), it appears unlikely that the U.S. embargo will be lifted anytime soon, despite recent changes to U.S. policy in 2000 that allowed food and pharmaceutical sales to Cuba for the first time since the embargo was enacted in 1962.

In the agribusiness sector, at least, the exiles don’t have much to worry about for the moment. Foreign investment is limited to citrus - where Israeli, Chilean, Greek and British firms have invested more than $50 million to improve the quality of Cuban oranges and grapefruits - and, to a lesser extent, tobacco. Foreign investment has yet to make a difference for Cuba’s struggling sugar industry, which this year is bracing for its smallest crop in 50 years. Yet things could change rapidly with a warming of U.S.-Cuban ties.

“Agriculture is the key to the Cuban economy,” said William Messina, executive coordinator of the University of Florida’s International Agricultural Trade and Development Center. “Tourism is growing by leaps and bounds, but it still represents only 10% of the economy.”

One company alone, Spain’s Grupo Sol Meliá, accounts for one-third of Cuba’s 38,000 hotel rooms. Its 19 luxury hotel properties from Havana in the west to Santiago de Cuba in the east make it the largest single foreign investor in the country. This year, some two million tourists are expected to visit Cuba - up from 1.7 million in 2000 - and that puts the Meliá chain in an ideal competitive position once the U.S. embargo ends and American tourists are allowed to visit Cuba freely.

In the coffee sector, however, foreign investment is almost non-existent, and most of Cuba’s production remains in the hands of three state entities: the Cooperativa de Producción Agraria (CPA), the Cooperativa de Caña y Servicios (CCS), and the Unidades Basicas de Producción Cooperativa (UBPC). By the mid-90s about 361,000 acres of Cuban farmland were dedicated to coffee, of which state-run farms accounted for 26%, teh CPA 18%, the CCS 31% and the UBPC 25%.

On Cuba’s overall potential, Messina said, “We know the embargo won’t last forever, and there’s a very good possibility that once the embargo is lifted, it will have more of an impact on U.S. agriculture than all the nations of the Caribbean Basin Initiative.”

Even if the embargo isn’t lifted, Cuba will continue to trade with other countries.

“There is no doubt that an expansion of sales of Cuban coffee on the international market will act as a stimulus to its cultivation and production,” according to the government publication, Business Tips on Cuba. “Another incentive could be external financing of coffee production to facilitate acquisition of fertilizers, fuels, herbicides and provisions. Cuba possesses the modern technology necessary to guarantee the agricultural and industrial processing of its coffee for export.”

Asked if he’d consider investing in his homeland once Castro is gone, Gaviña - the Cuban exile who hates Fidel with a passion - doesn’t hesitate. “Of course,” he says. “We’d have to rebuild the country. And we’re eager to do that.”

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 15:13:27 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Cuban coffee issues

I. Identification

1. The Issue

Although the U.S. embargo prohibits the importation of Cuban coffee, grocery stores and cafeterias in predominately Cuban American communities still sell their version of Cuban coffee. This is possible because the coffee is sold and marketed by U.S. companies as Cuban coffee even though it is made from other countries’ coffee beans. Meanwhile, the coffee industry in Cuba, traditionally a source of national pride, struggles to remain a profitable enterprise. It is unclear whether coffee production outside of Cuba and labelling it Cuban coffee is an infringement of geographic indication. The details of this case merit attention even if they are not involved in any legal trade dispute proceedings due to the international tension between Cuba, the coffee exporter, and the U.S. the world’s foremost coffee importer.

2. Description

Tu Cafe Cafetera Cuban coffee is known for its strong taste served in small amounts with excessive caffeine and sugar. The coffee beans are finely grounded and dark roasted. The coffee is prepared espresso style using a machine like the one to in the picture to the left.

According to a coffee commentator on www.ineedcoffee.com , “What tequila is to liquor, café cubano is to the world of coffee.”

* * Listen to how one Cuban coffee distributor in Miami, Florida describes Cuban coffee. * *
Audio version in Spanish. For English text version click here.

A. Historical Overview of the Coffee Industry in Cuba

According to the Tea and Coffee magazine, coffee production was introduced to Cuban society in the mid-18th century. By the year 1790, Cuba was a main exporter to Spain; soon French coffee farmers fleeing the Haitian revolution established themselves in Cuba, furthering the coffee industry on the Island. The Island’s environment of high humidity and undisturbed soils fostered the development of the industry.

By the 1820s, coffee production was contributing even more to Cuba’s economy than sugar. In the years right before the Cuban Revolution (1956), Cuba was exporting 20,000 metric tons of coffee valued at $21.5 million and was producing its highest ever yield of coffee per acre (316.6 pounds per acre).

With the Cuban Revolution came the nationalization of the coffee farms and the decline of the coffee industry in general. Production levels during the late 1960s and 1970s were comparable to those of the 1920s. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the industry had a slight recovery only to be devastated once again with the fall of the Soviet Union (Cuba’s principle benefactor) in 1990.

Why the decline of the coffee industry? First, Cuba’s economic downfall led to further migration to the cities and a weaker labor force available to the coffee farms. Second, in an effort to strengthen the coffee industry during the 1960s, the government aimed at developing a coffee growing belt along the outskirts of Havana by using a volunteer labor force. The replacement of traditional coffee farmers with volunteers who knew nothing about coffee greatly affected the industry. The program was unsuccessful and in order to redeem itself the government established yet another program in 1989 under the direction of Raul Castro, Fidel Castro’s brother. The later program, known as the Turquino program, improved the agricultural infrastructure and offered agricultural workers better housing. Nevertheless, the program did not attract much attention.

B. Cuban coffee in Exile

Naturally, Cuban coffee is very popular in areas of the United States where there is a large Cuban American population such as Miami. However, due to legal restrictions the Cuban coffee consumed in the U.S. is made by grinding beans from anywhere but Cuba.

In fact, as a local Miami newspaper, the Miami New Times, points out:

Coffee Workers “There is nothing Cuban about Cuban coffee. The beans are grown in Brazil or Colombia, the coffee machine is made in Italy, and the person who serves it to you from a sidewalk cafeteria is most likely going to be from Nicaragua, Argentina, or anywhere else but Cuba.”

Miami-based businesses such as the well-known Café Pilon profit greatly from selling and marketing their version of Cuban coffee. The company, which has roots as a Cuban company dating back to 1860s, was expelled from Cuba in 1960 due to the Revolution. With approximately 1.4 million Cuban Americans living in the U.S. today, they have found a viable market and average $70 million in annual sales.

B. The Cuban coffee industry on the Island

Havana 89 miles from U.S. SignIn the meantime (and only 90 miles away) Cuba struggles to maintain coffee production as a rewarding industry. Harsh climatic conditions, out-of-date technology, and massive rural-urban migration have contributed to deteriorated roads and a lack of adequate work force. Morevoer, “The loss of experienced workers has forced the government to rely on unpaid middle- and high-school students to harvest the coffee crop,” reports CubaNews.

According to Cuba’s Ministry of Agriculture’s Cuba-Café-Cacao Agribusiness group, new varieties of Cuban coffee are being prepared for export with focused interest on the Japanese market. The top importers of Cuban coffee (made with authentic Cuban coffee beans) are Japan, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada, Switzerland and the Netherlands. However, the export of Cuban coffee still remains a disappointment when compared to pre-Revolution statistics. According to Tea and Coffee, “export revenue from coffee comes to just 1% of the total value of Cuban exports, down from 3.9% in 1956.”

Coffee holds traditional value and historic cultural significance for Cubans. It reminds Cubans of their origins as “campesinos” or their origins as peasant/rural-dwellers as well as the historical and economic importance of slavery and sugar and coffee plantations (along with tobacco, these were the top three exports during Cuba’s birth as a nation in the early 1900s). In addition, for many the small cup of coffee is not just their much-needed caffeine fix for the day, but also their time to socialize and unwind at their local cafeteria.

According to an interview with a current visitor from the Island, Cubans today are only alloted 2 ounces of coffee every 15 days. The coffee’s quality sufers greatly since it is mixed in with other ingredients to render greater quantities.

Source:

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 15:11:37 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, June 9, 2008

Procter & Gamble to merge coffee operations with Smuckers

Procter & Gamble European headquarter in Geneva

Consumer products giant Procter & Gamble said Wednesday it was spinning off its Folgers coffee business into JM Smucker Co. in a 3.3 billion dollar deal.

P&G shareholders will own 53 percent of the new business, which includes a range of Folgers products including coffee and food and Smucker’s line of jams and related food items.

“The proposed transaction creates a powerful portfolio of brands and an even stronger Smucker Company with annual sales approaching five billion dollars, and greater scale that will benefit all of its businesses,” the companies said in a joint statement.

“Folgers is a perfect strategic fit within our portfolio of leading and iconic North American food brands,” said Tim Smucker, chairman and co-chief executive of Smucker.

“Folgers will become our tenth number-one brand in North America and will further enhance the high quality, great tasting, diverse product offerings that consumers expect from Smucker.”

AG Lafley, chairman and CEO of Procter & Gamble, said the the move enables the company to concentrate on other key personal care products ranging from diapers to detergent.

“Strategically, P&G has exited certain categories in order to focus on our core businesses and enhance the growth profile of the portfolio,” he said.

“The structure and terms of this transaction deliver on the goals we stated for the separation of the coffee business from P&G.”

P&G had previously sold other food brands including Jif peanut butter and Crisco shortening to Smucker in 2002.

“Smucker’s core beliefs, values, and principles are very much the same as those of P&G,” Lafley said. “We cannot think of a better long-term home for P&G’s former coffee employees and brands than Smucker.”

The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2008, subject to customary regulatory and shareholder approvals.

The expanded Smucker Company will add over 1,250 employees in sales, marketing and other functions.

P&G will spin off Folgers to its shareholders in a tax-free transaction, with a simultaneous merger with Smucker. That will leave current P&G shareholders with 53.5 percent of Smucker shares and current Smucker shareholders the remaining 46.5 percent of the combined company.

Procter & Gamble shares rose 1.1 percent to 66.14 dollars and Smucker added 2.1 percent to 54.90 dollars.

Source:
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j5p4igoRPsVBrbMaQZjuXH6hflFA

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 04:22:20 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Coffee, after the war

Tran Tan Hung, a former soldier, mixes coffee at his Ho Chi Minh City drink stand, where customers who fought on both sides of the war gather for drinks and laughs

A former soldier scarred by Agent Orange now enjoys a quiet life running a Ho Chi Minh City coffee stand.

The coffee seller pulls up his shirt to reveal two small rashes on his back.

“They broke out a few days ago. I couldn’t sleep.”

Tran Tan Hung, 64, says he has been feeling better in the days since the rash broke out.

His wife applies traditional herbs to the rashes everyday.

Hung, sitting next to his coffee cart that is filled with glasses and bottles, begins explaining the benefits of the herbs when his daughter comes to ask for money to pay the gas delivery man.

“Bring him here. I’ll give him the money myself,” he says.

The daughter runs off.

The father’s eyes follow her.

“She’s a smart kid,” he says. “She doesn’t have it.”

“It” is Agent Orange poisoning.

The toxin entered his body during the American war and has not shown its effects on his 12-year-old daughter.

It affects his two sons, though.

Both in their twenties, they are mentally retarded.

It’s an old story: the US sprayed some 80 million liters of herbicides, including 20 million liters of Agent Orange on Vietnam during the war to defoliate trees, remove cover and destroy crops used by the Viet Cong, or the National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam.

Agent Orange, named after the color of the stripe on barrels in which it was stored, contained tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (known as TCDD), one of the most poisonous chemicals ever made by man.

According to US military estimates, an estimated 2-4 million citizens and soldiers were affected by the chemical.

Current data show that roughly 10 percent of the total land area in southern Vietnam was hit by Agent Orange.

In some southern provinces, 50 percent of the land was completely stripped by the defoliant.

It has caused cancer in those exposed directly to it while often afflicting children born to exposed parents with mental retardation.

“We saw the planes spraying. It looked like mist over the forest,” Hung says.

“The next day we woke up. The trees were all branches.”

Originally from the northern port city of Hai Phong, Hung moved south to fight in 1964.

His unit crossed the Truong Son mountain range, where the famous Ho Chi Minh Trail carried supplies from north to south.

He fought small battles in the central highlands province of Lam Dong.

He was then stationed in a forest at the edge of the mountain range as part of a logistics team.

“We stayed there for 11 years, building roads and bridges, taking care of the warehouses,” Hung says.

“The chemicals must have gotten into the streams.

We drank water from the streams.”

Some of his comrades are dead, some alive, and some he has not heard of since the war ended.

For the past 18 years, Hung has sold coffee from a cart on a grassy median divider between two apartment buildings on Ho Chi Minh City’s Phan Xich Long Street.

The cafe is popular in the neighborhood.

Every morning, old men who fought on both sides of the war come for a cigarette and coffee.

They sit until the sun is high.

“He likes sunlight,” Hung says, thrusting his chin toward a man who does not budge when the first rays of noon sun splash on his bald head.

The man is 70-year-old Pham Tan Loi, an interpreter for the Americans during the war.

“Good thing I didn’t know him [Hung] then,” Loi says.

“He would have shot me.”

The two men look at each other and laugh.

Last month, a Vietnamese testified before a US House of Representatives hearing on Agent Orange for the first time.

The event was titled: “Our forgotten Responsibility: What Can We Do to Help Victims of Agent Orange?”

“We don’t know what happens in the American political world, but ‘forgotten responsibility’? ‘Victims’?, That is acknowledging a lot,” said Dr. Nguyen Thi Ngoc Phuong, former president of HCMC-based Tu Du Women’s Hospital, after returning from the US

Phuong said that for a long time, the US had denied responsibility for the damage Agent Orange did to the Vietnamese environment and people.

In some places, especially former US military bases and storage sites such as the Da Nang and Bien Hoa airports, the soil and water are seriously polluted.

Last year, President George W. Bush promised US$3 million to fund environmental clean-up.

The funds have yet to be distributed.

Vaughan C. Turekian, Chief International Officer for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, told the House hearing it would cost $15 million to remove dioxins from Da Nang alone.

Phuong said some congressmen are interested.

“They told me to give them a number,” she said.

“This is a good sign.”

A lawsuit the Vietnamese Organization for Victims of Agent Orange (VAVA) brought against the companies that manufactured the herbicides has been rejected by a US court of appeals.

In 2005, the suit was dismissed by the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York on the ground that there was no legal basis for the plaintiff’s claims.

“If we fail in this generation, we’ll continue to sue in the next,” Phuong, who is also VAVA’s vice chair, said.

Hung says he has a “light case” of Agent Orange poisoning.

The rashes rarely occur.

“It got serious only once, in 1980.

Mucus leaked from the rashes and covered my face.”

He is healthy now.

“But he’s old,” his wife says.

“He can’t sell the coffee by himself.”

Every morning, Hung’s sons carry the glasses and bottles from the apartment and set up the cart.

“They can’t tell the time or one color from another,” Hung says of his sons.

“But they’re very strong.”

When business is slow, the young men sit on a stone bench in the park, sometimes talking, sometimes smiling.

“He is lucky to have them,” the mother says.

“They’re his arms and legs.”

Hung tells his customers a piece of good news: the government has increased his sons’ monthly allowance.

They receive VND318,000 (US$19.70) every month now.

Hung gets VND374,000 ($23.17).

“They’re almost catching up with me,” the father says, laughing.

Source:
http://www.thanhniennews.com/features/?catid=10&newsid=39131

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 04:20:28 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Man or machine: who’s the better roastmaster?

 

Technological improvements in coffee roasting have followed two basic but very different philosophies over the past several years. The first approach to technological advance in coffee roasting attempts to eliminate the “human factor” with automated control systems of varying sophistication. The second approach attempts to assist the human operator in better control of the roasting process with increasingly sophisticated systems of measurement (including temperature, moisture, humidity, air pressure, etc.) and roasting parameter control (time, temperature, method of heat application and airflow). 

Obviously, the first approach cannot be achieved without bringing to bear all the tools required by the second approach. The difference, in the end, is that in the first case a predetermined set of parameters is established which cue off measurements collected during the roasting process. A control process unit, a rudimentary computer, essentially, controls the roast. In the second approach, the control process unit is a human operator who also adjusts roast parameters according to collected data but has more flexibility to fine-tuning a specific roast according to variables, often very nuanced, that occur during a particular roast.

The argument for the first system is that a computer will always be more consistent than a human operator. Those arguing to keep the human roaster employed say that an experienced roastmaster can always achieve a better result because no two lots of coffee are the same, that coffee changes every day, and the roasting environment does as well, from day to day and hour to hour. Some changes in the roasting environment are still too subtle for computers and today’s measurement systems to detect — nothing can replace a dedicated, passionate roaster who is deeply concerned about the final result. That person will bring all their senses and experience to bear to bring out the best in each roast while still hewing to the company’s preferred roast stile.

Where proponents have room to co-exist is pretty much the same way the proponents and detractors of super-automatic espresso machines have learned to live together — if the human operator is competent enough, and dedicated enough to their work and the result, then they can probably out-roast an automated roasting system. The problem is, both camps agree, that there aren’t enough people out there who are capable and desirous of doing the job.

At least both sides claim to agree. The fact is, at some point in a roasting company’s growth, it becomes very difficult to keep the craft approach. By increments, systems become more automated and gradually, for financial reasons, the human operator is eliminated. In addition to losing their roastmaster, companies at this point also often lose the only person (the roastmaster) who could have helped them adjust and perfect as much as possible, the right automated roast profiles. Quality suffers, of course, but again, the person that would know (again, the roastmaster) has already been shown the door.

To whichever end the technology is being applied, much of it is being developed for existing roasting installations rather than for new equipment. Much of the currently available new equipment, though, is continually being upgraded in the ability to measure and control the parameters of the roasting process.

Also complicating things are those “craft” roasters who don’t believe that any technological advancements are necessary and that all that’s needed for a good roast is a zealously dedicated roastmaster with a good sense of smell, hearing, sight and taste and, of course, a good piece of roasting equipment, preferably of German manufacture and of a 1920’s vintage.

Read on for comments on this most vital issue from some leading coffee roasting experts.

Stephan Diedrich, owner, Diedrich Coffee Roasters; Sandpoint, Idaho:

“We’ve been getting much more heavily involved in the automation technology and the automatic roast control systems. And with that we have quite a few new things, whether they be small in-store roasters up to the industrial roasting systems. So in automation, there’s quite a bit new that’s there. In roasting technology there is a lot that can be done even with existing roasting technology and really refining it and improving the quality that is produced by any machine — and that is a matter of training people. But with the automated roast control systems that we design, we have different variables that are really based on the versatility that you have with the Diedrich roasters. Most of the other roasters on the market, only have a small fraction of the variables that can be controlled on a Diedrich roaster.

The automation control systems are designed around the controllability that you have with the Diedrich coffee roasters but we’re adapting or retrofitting other machines on the market with the automated roast control systems. The variables we control on the Diedrich roaster are air temperatures, bean temperatures, air flow velocity and time. We can achieve very exact degrees of roast and with the control systems, we’re monitoring or using 15-second check points for all four of those variables. On the big roasting systems we’re getting much more involved in the commercial roasting systems, the industrial roasting systems, the 45 kilo through four bag roasting machines and that is the essence of what we are doing in new areas at this point.”

Regarding general trends in the industry vis-a-vis its approach to roasting, Diedrich also offered his perspective. “We’re seeing more of the large commercial roasters getting more heavily involved in the specialty coffee marketplace. We’re seeing the big commercial roasters who are doing large batch roasting. getting into smaller batch roasting and a wider selection of coffee. Our large commercial roasters were designed for customers that started off with the smaller in-store Diedrich roasters and then grew in size and because of the differences in the Diedrich roaster and our roasting medium and the variables that you can control with the Diedrich roasters, we’re finding more of the big roasters now that are looking for the kind of quality that you can achieve with the smaller in-store roasters.”

Cal Amodeo, president; Coffee Brothers, Inc.; Ontario, California:

Amodeo and the wood-burning Balestra roasters may represent a “retro”‘ trend in roasting outside of the two approach model outlined earlier. Then again, a wood burning system might simply be called an “alternative technology.”

“We have equipment that’s built from a company [Balestra] in the southern parts of Italy, from Naples. They basically make state-of-the-art equipment and also make all the coffee roasters. We have three roasters from them and they are in different sizes. Basically they have a wood burning oven instead of gas. It’s an organic way of roasting coffee. The coffee bean at the molecular level is like wood, basically. We feel that certain woods enhance the flavor of particular coffees and other woods do the same for others. We are just trying to find better or more natural ways to produce coffee that tastes interesting and basically you have a better cup of coffee in the end.

“One of our roasters has a dual burning capability. Using both techniques of roasting, we find that the coffee that comes out when we’re roasting with wood, using the same dynamics as far as bringing the temperatures with these certain times, the end result is a little different. The wood roasted coffee has a little mellower taste and it has kind of a scent. It’s not a scent from the wood itself because you cannot smell a particular wood, but you have a subtle scent when you smell the coffee and you drink the coffee. And it’s not there in the same coffee roasted by gas.” Balestra, according to Amodeo, is no novice to building roasters. “Balestra’s been making coffee roasters for over 50 years and they are the only coffee roasting factory in the southern parts of Italy; they make roasters the old fashioned way.”

Trends in the development of coffee roasters, according to Amodeo, focus on the method of heating, “The American coffee roaster manufacturers, many of them, basically stayed with the infrared technology where they apply infrared heating elements on the bottom of the drum while it’s turning and that has it’s own qualities. I personally prefer the hot air going through.” Amodeo takes a dimmer view, however, of anything new in the industry, “Basically we are seeing the same regurgitation with different names.”

Paul Leighton, president; Cape Horn Coffee in Eugene, Oregon (and a past president of the Specialty Coffee Association of America):

“I think if you ask a lot of people who are the serious roasters, some of the people who have been the foundation to the real quality aspect of the SCAA, they would just as soon go backwards rather than forwards. If you have them an opportunity to buy an old cast iron Probat or a Gothot from the 1950s and 1960s, they would rather have that. There’s just some wonderful things about the cast iron versus sheet steel in the way it works and in the way it holds its heat. You’ve got an even distribution of heat, no hot spots. They were simple. A lot of people really liked that and from the standpoint of artisan roasting, they’d rather go back.”

Summing up the state of the coffee roasting industry, Leighton finds little heat to detect at the present time, “In terms of selling roasters, there isn’t that big of an aggressive market. Coffee growth, to a certain extent, is a little bit flat. From the standpoint of the structure of coffee, that really hasn’t changed. Our goals and our desire, as an industry, to produce consistent quality or consistent flavor performance have led people to work with sophisticated electronic devices. A lot of the new technology in measuring the roasting process is really cool. A lot of people are retrofitting their roasters that can really upgrade their performance.

With regard to the home roasting sector, Leighton also weighed in, “In the home roasting arena, there’s a new Hearthware, a roaster that is roughly twice the size of the original Hearthware. Hearthware has probably been the leading selling home roaster on the market for the last couple of years. They are coming out with a new one that is basically twice the capacity, which is something they needed from the beginning. So that’s going to be a real improvement in that market. The commercial world will find a use for that too in a lot of small sample roastings.”

Leighton speaks of his own roasters with what some might even see as a troubling attachment, “I personally use a San Franciscan and a Probat [sample roaster] and I just sold a 1956 three barrel Gothot. The minute I sold it, I regretted it, but I have visitation privileges.”

Carl Staub, president; Agtron, Inc.; Reno, Nevada: Over the past decade, Staub has made a disproportionately high contribution to the coffee industry’s increased understanding of the roasting process. His company produces several devices for measuring the degree of roast degree and for measuring temperature during the roasting process. Staub also conducts a roasting school, “I don’t know how many students have come through the Academy of Coffee Science that we teach, but I think we’ve had almost a thousand now since we started that school in 1991. In 1991, we were teaching basically computer control for the roaster, controlling the temperature of the environment and how to set up profiles for bean temperature and environment temperature and we sort of evolved from there.” Since 1991 things have changed a bit and Staub encapsulated those changes this way, “1 see a lot of PLC-based time temperature control, they call it profile roasting. We stopped doing that about four years ago; we were on to something called kinetic function roasting. The thing that makes that unusual is that it’s interactive with the coffee. The roaster sort of programs the system’s perimeters to get the disposition in the coffee that he wants and then the computer works interactively with the coffee to make changes along the way to sort of accomplish a certain character of coffee. I look at the coffee now because it’s so complex, like children, you have two kids from the same family and they are completely different and coffee is just like that. What it takes to motivate one child might be completely different than what it takes to motivate the other, so that’s how we look at coffee. So we let the coffee actually be an interactive part in the roasting process, the batch of coffee.” Currently, Staub sees the rest of the roasting industry pursuing the “profile” method, “Pretty much I’m seeing the same thing presented a lot of different ways — the profile roasting — a lot of fancy computer screens and stuff but really no change in the technolog ies.”

Staub sees a great deal more advancement to come as the coffee industry and its understanding of the roasting process continues to evolve, “The machinery itself hasn’t changed a lot. We’re learning a lot about more advance control for cooling cycles and we’re learning a lot about applying energy to the coffee more, effectively. In the future you’ll see changes in efficiency in the roasting cycle and better control for the roaster over a lot more of the perimeters that are essential, which we’re starting to identify. I think over the next five to ten years we’ll see manufactures of roasting equipment supplying the machines with more control as a standard feature. It won’t be considered an option anymore, it will be considered a necessity Because people learn that the more you can control, the better job you can do.”

Perhaps the most hopeful sign that the industry offers is that through the establishment of the Roaster’s Guild, an association of roasters formed under the auspices of the SCAA. The Roaster’s Guild is giving craft roasters, the passionate few, an organization within which the can exchange ideas, knowledge and skill sets in an effort to get the most out of the coffees that their members roast. After all, knowledge and understanding of the roasting process, are probably more important than the particular piece of equipment used to do it do the roasting. Danny O’Neil, current president of the SCAA said, “The most exciting thing happening as it relates to roasting is with our Roaster’s Guild. As you probably know, this has really taken off and we are now developing programs to, among other things, certify freshness in terms of roasted coffee. It is an extremely vibrant organization that you will be hearing much, much more about.” This year’s annual meeting of the Guild will be in August. Like last year, it is e xpected to be fully attended.

Posted by Fresh Roaster in 04:18:28 | Permalink | Comments (2)